We give compliance teams the program and the proof.
Digital compliance officers, senior advisory, and proven playbooks — deployed alongside the teams whose AI governance programs will be examined.
A practitioner blueprint for the Appendix A inventory, principle mapped controls, and the evidence pack that stands up to examination. Cited to the guideline text.
Every engagement is a blend — judgement from our practitioners, rigour from the playbooks, reach from the digital officers. The proportions change with the program.
Senior practitioners embedded with your team. Program design, regulator preparation, and the judgement calls that cannot be delegated to a tool. Our partners have sat on both sides of the examination table.
Learn more →02Field manuals distilled from real engagements. OSFI E-23 program build. EU AI Act high risk readiness. ISO 42001 first year operating cadence. Published openly. Our methodology is not the moat.
Learn more →03Named agents operating inside a governed methodology. Model discovery, evidence collection, regulatory change detection, validation drafting. They extend your team's reach without extending your exposure.
Learn more →Grounded in authoritative regulator data. The library moves when the regulator moves, and carried into every engagement through six capabilities that sit where the work already happens.
Ask the substrate a question, read the answer with its citations attached. Built for practitioners doing primary source work: boardroom memos, counsel review, supervisory preparation.
A digital compliance agentic layer that delivers dedicated agents, extending your team on recurring work, carrying cited reasoning into every step, and routing every decision to a named accountable owner.
Each engagement produces a playbook indexed to the regulator record and calibrated to your posture. The same artifact the agents run against is the methodology the firm publishes to the industry.
The layer reaches into the systems your teams already use: the GRC tool, the ticket queue, the document store. You do not adopt a new surface. The work shows up where the work already happens.
Every answer is traceable on two sides. Back to the regulatory instrument it came from, and back to the agent decision that produced it. Defensible to a board above, defensible to a supervisor below.
Teams building internal controls can reach the substrate directly. The API exposes what the firm uses: the record, the retrieval, the cited reasoning. For clients who want to ground their own systems in it.
Six capabilities, one authoritative record. Indexed from Justice Canada, OSFI, the OSC, Parliament, the Gazettes and the supervisors that sit beside them.
Every regulator of consequence has now published AI specific expectations, and every one of them is proportional, principles based, and unfinished. Programs that survive the next decade will not be the ones with the most software. They will be the ones whose compliance functions learned to operate AI themselves.
The firms doing the real work in this space publish openly, partner deeply, and sit beside clients long enough to be accountable for outcomes. We are building RegCore along those lines. Our playbooks are public. Our engagements are named in the room. Our agents are instruments of the method, not the product of it.
“Institutions hire compliance firms to be accountable for judgements they cannot outsource. Technology is useful when it sharpens that judgement, and dangerous when it pretends to replace it.”
Six topics dominate the boardroom conversations we are in. Our published work on each is where we begin most engagements.
The 17-field Appendix A inventory is the visible artifact. The harder work sits in Principles 1 through 6: evidence of independence, objectivity, and proportional control.
Continue reading →European Union · High-risk live Aug 2026The technical file required by Annex IV is not a document exercise. It is a standing assurance program, and most first movers underestimate it by a factor of four.
Continue reading →International · Certifiable standardThe management system clauses are well understood. The AI specific Annex A controls are where most pilot programs surface gaps they did not know they had.
Continue reading →Quebec · In forceADM transparency obligations sit upstream of model design. By the time a notification is drafted, the decision about whether the system can be deployed has already been made.
Continue reading →Canada · 2026 amendmentsRisk based compliance regimes absorbed model risk quietly. The new amendments are the first time the obligation is explicit, and the first time model documentation will be supervised.
Continue reading →United States · FoundationalGovern, Map, Measure, Manage is not the whole framework. The Generative Profile added in July 2024 is where serious programs are now doing their mapping work.
Continue reading →Six to twelve weeks. Target operating model, policy architecture, initial inventory and tiering, role design. Ends with a program your board and your supervisor can both read.
Retainer. A named partner and a working cadence with your first line. Regulatory change detection, validation review, and the supervisor conversations you want someone senior alongside.
Focused. Six to ten weeks ahead of a supervisory examination, thematic review, or internal audit. Evidence build, narrative, and rehearsal.
A compliance firm built for the AI era. We combine senior advisory with proprietary playbooks and digital compliance officers — AI agents that extend our clients' teams within a governed methodology. We work alongside clients, not over the wall.
Federally regulated financial institutions, insurers, investment dealers, and regulated AI platforms — the teams whose programs will be examined. Engagements range from initial AI governance program design to ongoing advisory and regulator preparation.
They are advisory tooling, not software we hand over and walk away from. Each deployment is scoped to the client's program, governed by our methodology, and operated alongside the client's compliance team. They extend reach, not replace judgement.
Canadian: OSFI, FINTRAC, CIRO, OSC, OPC, AMF. International: the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, Quebec Law 25, GDPR, DORA, US federal banking supervision, UK PRA. Frontier topics are covered in our published research. The library is the floor, not the ceiling.
A 45-minute conversation with a partner. We use it to understand the program state, the regulatory exposure, and the time horizon. Most engagements begin within three weeks of that call.
Yes. Our playbooks are public. The methodology is our product. The engagement is how we deliver it. We believe institutions should be able to read our thinking before they decide to work with us.
A 45-minute conversation with a partner. No slides. No pitch. We use it to understand your program, your exposure, and your time horizon, and to be honest about whether we are the right firm for it.
